- Football Samsung S8 S9 Plus Case Keep The Faith Phone Cover Add Name KTFBrand new
- FLIP WALLET CASE STAND COVER FOR SAMSUNG GALAXY A10 A20E A21S A40 A50 A51 A70New Arrival for Galaxy A21s and A41
- For Samsung Galaxy A40 A21S A51 A71 A70 A50 S20 Protective Case Ultra Slim CoverBrand new
- Football Samsung S5 S6 S7 Case Keep The Faith Phone Cover Add Name All Teams KTFBrand new
- Silver and Rose Gold Spotted Flip Cover Wallet Phone Case Dots Spotty Spots i496Brand new
- FLIP WALLET PU LEATHER CASE STAND COVER FOR SAMSUNG GALAXY PHONESNew for Galaxy S20, A10, A20E, A40, A41, A50,A70,A51
- White and Black Spots Phone Case Cover Spotted Dots Spotty Print Retro i522Brand new
- DISNEY DUMBO ELEPHANT FLIP WALLET PHONE CASE COVER FOR IPHONE SAMSUNG HUAWEIBrand new
- Winnie The Pooh Eeyore Braver Quote Leather Flip Wallet Phone Case CoverBrand new
- Black & Gold Spotted Phone Case Cover Spots Polka Dot Dotted Spotty Design F654Brand new
- DISNEY COLLAGE DOODLE ART QUOTE FLIP WALLET PHONE CASE FOR IPHONE SAMSUNG HUAWEIBrand new
- Winnie The Pooh Eeyore Braver Quote Phone Case CoverBrand new
- STAR WARS LUK DARTH VADER SPACE FLIP WALLET PHONE CASE FOR IPHONE SAMSUNG HUAWEIBrand new
- Tempered Glass Cute Cartoon Stitch Soft Edge Case Back For Various Phone CoverBrand new
- The Joker Phone Case Cover for Apple iPhone Samsung Huawei Nokia EtcBrand new
- For Samsung Galaxy S20FE 5G A21S A51 Leather Wallet Flip Stand Phone Case CoverBrand new
- SHOCKPROOF CASE ULTRA SLIM COVER FOR SAMSUNG GALAXY S8 S9 S10 S20 A21S A40 A51Brand new
- ELVIS PRESLEY THE KING FLIP PHONE CASE COVER for SAMSUNG GALAXY S5 S6 S7 S8 S91st Class Delivery - Fast and Free Shipping
1038 single core and 3060 for multi core scores.
I see this as likely the chipset that we will see in the upcoming S21 and S21+, I’ve also seen rumours that samsung is to use a tri-cluster 1+3+4 setup, but I do not think Samsung’s standard 5nm SoC will have the Cortex X1, going by these numbers I wouldn’t be surprised to see an 1x A78, 3x A77 and those 4x A55 Overclocked at 2.21GHz, even with the 5nm process being used overclocking chipsets likely will be having an adverse effect on efficiency hence why Sammy will be placing 300mah of battery more inside the S21+.
We have seen speculation that Apple A14 chip on its 5nm node only got mi or performance upgrades to maintain a superior level of efficient of the A13 it replaces, hence why Apple has likely to have been able to reduce its battery sizes and introduce the rumoured 5.4” iPhone 12 Mini with reasonable battery life on top of iOS optimisation, performance gains that I think a lot of tech enthusiasts especially want won’t actually materialise.
Only when we see 1 or 2 Cortex X1 will we begin to see big power jumps, possibly for the S21 Ultra or a Galaxy Tab Pro, albeit I think that will be a rather power hungry chip, the X1 core does not use efficiency as its goal!
But will it have AMD graphics?
Why not go with a MediaTek Dimensity 1000+ chipset instead?
Anonymous, 25 Sep 2020(Him)👶🔫👨🦱(You)
That’s what I just witnessed.I hate having to do that, but I literally repeated him the same thing with links as proofs and he still thought he was right and I was wrong and insulting my intelligence and knowledge, so I had to make this kind of, “proof only, no talk” post…
But sadly it won’t matter and he will still answer and say that I don’t know about physic and that he is right or something of the sort…
Demongornot, 25 Sep 2020“That’s is just impossible in the law of physics.”
That’s what I just witnessed.
Morsel, 25 Sep 2020I’m not even sure why is your ego hurt here at all.
Ever seen a dog walking by and bark… moreSays the Chiwawa
Demongornot, 25 Sep 2020Dude, I think you have communication issues, and I am not saying that to be mean or to insult,… moreMan !
I don’t have problem with you different opinions. Everybody might have different opinions.
But it gets worse when you give a base theory and which is not compatible with the Law of Physics.
You’re still arguing with the fact that you said LiDAR doesn’t measure time.
I mean How can it measure the distance if time isn’t measured ?
Now how can a dot of laser split into many dots ?
Didn’t you read in school that light always goes straight while remaining the same medium ?
Like I said, You’re clearly from Business Administration or Humanities.
I’m probably just wasting my time to make you understand hard thing when you’ve no clue about the easiest laws.
Anonymous, 25 Sep 2020I’m surprised you aren’t ashamed of displaying a name at all. Guess your ego is supp… moreI’m not even sure why is your ego hurt here at all.
Ever seen a dog walking by and barking towards the passer by for no reason ?
You’re a good example of that dog.
Demongornot, 25 Sep 2020Dude, I think you have communication issues, and I am not saying that to be mean or to insult,… moreMental barrier
Morsel, 25 Sep 2020Same to you.
ALso with a real name of which you’re not ashamed of.I’m surprised you aren’t ashamed of displaying a name at all. Guess your ego is suppressing reality and reason.
Morsel, 24 Sep 2020The problem with you is you lack base knowledge.
You just read a a post about something and t… moreDude, I think you have communication issues, and I am not saying that to be mean or to insult, but literally it seem like you can’t get what I am saying to you, I don’t know if this is language barrier or something else, but really, you always, constantly miss-interpret what I write.
[deleted post]Same to you.
ALso with a real name of which you’re not ashamed of.
Demongornot, 24 Sep 2020I literally took a screenshot on purpose to avoid any misconceptions and make sure I didn’… moreThe problem with you is you lack base knowledge.
You just read a a post about something and then reply about that.
This is why you comment has different meaning over time.
I called you a liar not because of one thing.
You denied that you told anything about fast lens.
That’s a lie.
Now you gave a screenshot and didn’t bother to read the line which I said just before couple of lines. And the way you mentioned it proved it that you didn’t understand a thing what I said.
Because same answer.
You lack base knowledge.
Like I said Last time,
You should rejoin High School. Your physics knowledge is weak.
Light doesn’t split in the middle. Whatever the post you read says I don’t care. Unless there were that amount of beams initially there is no way it will split in the middle.
You’re the one who said big light source isn’t needed for high res sensor. Now you’re trying to put that on me.
So, shouldn’t I call you a liar ?
Berserker89, 24 Sep 2020What a great reply.
I think i can make a very interesting movie script from your comment. Sure, because your answers are so exceptional that you’ll be engraved into a monolith for every to be witnessed by mankind.
Berserker89, 24 Sep 2020What a great reply.
I think i can make a very interesting movie script from your comment. There is nothing more ironic that a guy who laugh about someone supposedly loosing his time by investing his own time trying to laugh at him.
Morsel, 24 Sep 2020Hello Mr. Liar.
Can I call you Liar ?
I mean It suits you.
First of all ,
Lets talk a… moreI literally took a screenshot on purpose to avoid any misconceptions and make sure I didn’t state an wrong informations about what you previously said, which is why on my previous comment I clearly said I was not sure what you said exactly, but not only I put a screenshot but I also put a link, how can you say I am a liar when I am literally quoting what you said with a literal screenshot ?
You actually don’t understand how those work despite me explaining it to you, I don’t have “theories”, that’s the difference between me and other peoples and why I often talk so surely about what I said, because I do my researches before posting, it isn’t even me having knowledge or my opinion, it is literally hard written facts.
And facts are :
ToF = Time of flight, which mean anything using any phenomena going from point A to point B and allowing to measure from point B back to point A the time it took, it can be light or other forms of electromagnetic radiations like mmWaves, it can be sound, it can be many other things with this image as a PROOF :
LiDAR = “Laser imaging, Detection, And Ranging” AND “Light Detection And Ranging” (because it is NOT ALWAYS about lasers), it refer, literally the name say it all, to any method using light, either in general or as a laser to make out informations, from simple distance to, more commonly, depth map.
Depth Sensor = The name is also a no brainer here, a sensor that can detect depth.
A ToF can be a simple laser rangefinder, laser autofocus is a good example, it can also be LiDARs and other things. Not a theory, it is a FACT, and it is literally in the name.
LiDARs work on multiple ways with those two charts as a PROOF :
It isn’t the name of a specific technology but, like “vehicles”, it is about a method, it can be a single laser as, seen here with this video as a PROOF :
It can be more complex implementations from a multiple dots or lines in which it is “Structured Light” technique, as seen here with this image as a PROOF :
Lines : https://www.azom.com/images/Article_Images/ImageForArticle_16003(2).jpg
Dots : https://www.rpcphotonics.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/3d-structured-light.jpg
And many other patterns.
There are more than just structured light as LiDAR can also use a grid of dots/lines but rather than computing the deformations of each to gather depth, it can use ToF on each of those to get their distance, there are other methods (like 3D Stereo who isn’t a LiDAR) to gather depth informations :
Yes, Face ID use a SINGLE diode and split it into 30k dots as seen here :
It use what is called a VCSEL (Vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser) diode to emit the initial laser which is then diffracted using a DOE (Diffractive Optical Element) to create that many dots, which is exactly what I said, and what you failed to understand, once again.
Those aren’t knowledge on physic, those are facts from patterns, retro engineering and technical spec sheets.
Yes, I do write big comments, because already with many details, there are peoples like you who still can’t understand despite literally a detailed and simplified explanation, so how would you understand a complex and short explanation ?
They aren’t conflicting, you just aren’t able to understand them to beggin with and interpret things so wrong that you conclude I talk about different things, as in reality, things are super easy to understand :
It begin with a laser which pass through a filter who split it into many (30k) dots.
And you are the one who think we can’t diffract a laser that way despite evidences of the contrary :
I can’t count the number of time I link reliable sources (like patents, scientific papers, article from scientific news, etc) and peoples just totally ignore them and pretend I am wrong and they are right while I literally only quote facts, and you are the king at that.
First link, I asked and learned from what the guy wrote.
Second link, I stated facts, regardless that you dislike it because it doesn’t match with your beliefs, those are facts, not a theory.
I didn’t talked about “12Mp laser beams”.
I talked about 12Mp Flash LiDAR, which use either ONE widely unfocused or NO lasers (simple LED) as seen here :
“I said 100 beams to give another example like if the laser beams size is big than 100 beams are more than enough.”
Literally, this sentence isn’t even proper English, “laser beams size is big than 100 beams are more than enough” mean absolutely nothing, it isn’t a coherent sentence.
And it probably reflect your idea on the subject.
Still, 12Mp is the industry standard for many DSLR camera and only few years ago we started to see more than few reaching over 20Mp, many are still on the 12Mp region today as those resolution already give enough details, what matter is the improvement on quality those 12Mp image gave rather than the pure resolution.
I had many XMp things who had a crappy quality that would be far lesser than their supposed resolution by an order of magnitude, this is the perfect example of how resolution isn’t everything, pixel loss have greatly reduced nowaday which is exactly why we got more sensors over 12Mp as we have pretty good 12Mp sensors, it wouldn’t have make senses to have higher resolution if the quality didn’t improved in the first place.
So regardless what you say, 12Mp is STILL the standard because it is already high enough, even downscalling it it still output a more than big enough resolution for most uses.
Demongornot, 24 Sep 2020Yes, I was mentioning how useless and annoying you were, your troll mind did the rest and summ… moreWhat a great reply.
I think i can make a very interesting movie script from your comment.
Demongornot, 24 Sep 2020And I am just getting started 😁
Literally I do so much things at once on my computer that it … more“Literally I do so much things at once on my computer that it doesn’t waste a single minute on my day”
Judging by the length of your hundreds of comments it doesn’t look like you are doing that much😂😂😂😂
Your computer doesn’t waste a single minute?
Maybe you should do the same with your life. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Oh man, i haven’t laughed this much since your last comment.